Post by Boni Jergen on Apr 18, 2005 15:33:35 GMT -5
Why do they give all that Money to MICHEAL JACKSON (sex crime serial-sicko) but Nothing to NEIL (Family man - spreads good cheer every where)VIRUS?
Micahel jacks'ons last album LOST Sony $20 million dollars, I read on the news. Even if Neil's album sold only ONE copy, it would not have lost $20 million, I guaratee you that! And I know he sells more than one copy. Because of the fans that Post here on this board and come to the shows. So my point being this - Neil would have been a more profitable signning for Sony than Michael jackons!!!
They would have $20 million MORE dollars in their bank accout if they didn't sign Jack s on, and instead and had signed NEIL!!!
Do the Math, SONY!!!!!!!!
Micahel jacks'ons last album LOST Sony $20 million dollars, I read on the news. Even if Neil's album sold only ONE copy, it would not have lost $20 million, I guaratee you that! And I know he sells more than one copy. Because of the fans that Post here on this board and come to the shows. So my point being this - Neil would have been a more profitable signning for Sony than Michael jackons!!!
They would have $20 million MORE dollars in their bank accout if they didn't sign Jack s on, and instead and had signed NEIL!!!
Do the Math, SONY!!!!!!!!
[/shadow]